Skip to main content

There’s nothing romantic about talk of welfare state; it’s actually nightmare


By Someshwar Nayak*
It is time one talked about social welfare. Social welfare according to most of the people is like magic trick played by state; but to be precise there is nothing like social welfare, social welfare is most illogical and faulty concept which people all across the globe ever came in touch with. Contagiousness of such concepts are a matter of concern; because growing youth and dormant people are their prime target, which covers most of the population and plethora of human resources.
Such concepts are insanely dangerous because it drives people to grow sapling of slavery which eventually end up taking form of giant lurky oak with several poisonous limbs. Later on such limbs are the one and solely reason why we face state of chaos and miseries, like we have already seen what happened during the collapse of centrally planned state like Soviet Union and Eastern European economies in early 1990s.
James Buchanan who won Nobel in Economics Science talked about one robust term which was apart from so called conventional term called ‘market failure’. He talked about something called ‘government failure’, he further said that government composed allocations of resources are not perfectly efficient either. His precise insight was that democratic political systems create their own inevitable externalities and some people can use the system to impose costs on other.
Precise observation of what Buchanan is saying is that there’s nothing like state as benevolent lord of the individuals, there’s nothing like welfare state and welfare only applies to individuals not to groups. He was well aware of what welfare state is and our hope is to make every single individual awake of what welfare state romance is all about.
Even if we will talk about well respected Economist like Adam Smith then we can observe that he clearly assigned the duties of sovereign in his book, “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations”. He clearly writes that the sovereign has only three duties to attend: first, the duty of protecting the society from violence; second, the duty to protect every member of society from injustice and oppression of every other member of it; third, the duty of maintaining certain public institutions and certain public works.
So thinking of state as welfare state is nothing more or less than idiocy of each and every individual because it is the way to take individual rights away. It is coercive force which takes all our liberty and freedom; which in turn end up hurting one individual to feed gain to other.
Even what French Economist Frederic Bastiat said drives us toward individual rights we recieve from nature, he basically said that in spite of the cunning of artful political leaders; individuality, liberty, property are three gifts from God precede all human legislation and are superior to it. And we are well aware that in social welfare such godly gifts are taken away by honouring state as the name of God.
Social welfare is always faulty because it romanticize the reality, we can’t create God like bodies which can compose something called paradise. As Milton Friedman very robustly said there’s no paradise. People who romanticize state are insanely unaware of concept of individuality and concept of self interest. State too are driven by self interest force; but in more pathetic fashion.
Harsh truth is that social welfare is highly immoral bulldozing force that cheats people on the name of so called welfare, if we really concerned about people then it will be really good if we start thinking in terms of individual as soon as possible. Genesis of thinking in terms of individual will be the only coordinate when well-being and prosperity will start peeping into the soul of the individuals; which in turn will lead to the well-being and prosperity of nation.
The points basically we are discussing is that there’s nothing like lord or guardian state who will create paradise for individuals, it is quite logical to think that what kind of paradise they are talking about by taking our rights away; on one place they are taking our individual rights and on other they are blabbering about welfare. This doesn’t need any complex economic calculations but instead we just need simple and basic logic to understand.
That’s why problem is not in its complexity but problem is that people talk about stuffs but they don’t even analyze how misleading the whole idea is about; critical thinking is scarce and tons of nonsense is floating all around the globe and people are romantically consuming it.
Again ending my value with the observation that social welfare is most illogical and faulty concept, we need to make everyone aware of what state is doing to take our individual rights away. We need to stop people; not forcefully but by making aware that the romantic dreams they are consuming about state is not romantic dreams at all; it is a big nightmare!

*Economics graduate, University of Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Achieving net-zero emission 'elusive': Lack of dialogue on climate issues

By Dr Manoj Kumar Mishra*   The landslides in Kerala serve as a stark reminder of the need for urgent action on climate change, highlighting the complacency of India and other major nations regarding climate issues. Political leaders and influential figures in India often prioritize power and material gains, while ordinary citizens exploit the environment to satisfy immediate needs. 

Everyone we meet is a teacher – if we only know how to connect the dots

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  We observe Teacher's Day on 05 September every year. In my journey from being a student and later a teacher which of course involves being a life-long student, I have come across many teachers who have never entered the portals of a educational institution, in addition to those to whom we pay our respects on Teachers Day.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Teachers in conflict zones displaying 'extraordinary commitment, courage' in the face of adversity

By Bharat Dogra*  While the devastation of conflict and war zones often draws attention to the tragic loss of life, a less visible yet equally alarming crisis unfolds over time: the disruption of education. This turmoil poses a significant threat to the future prospects of children and their opportunities for growth. 

Manmade disaster? Infrastructure projects in, around Vadodara caused 'devastating' floods

Counterview Desk  In a letter to local, Gujarat, and Indian authorities, several concerned citizens* have said that there has been devastating flood and waterlogging situation in Vadodara region since Monday 26th August 2024 which was "avoidable", stating, this has happened because of "multiple follies, flaws and fallacies across all levels of governance."

Were Lok Sabha results stolen in 79 constituencies? NGO panel answers

Counterview Desk  The Independent Panel for Monitoring Indian Elections (IPMIE), consisting of a group of experts from various disciplines and multinational backgrounds, has released its final recommendations on the protecting election integrity in India, calling upon the Indian authorities to implement these with immediate effect. This was done in response to growing concerns about the integrity of India’s 2024 general election.