Skip to main content

Modi has not paid enough attention to curtail population by discouraging births

By NS Venkataraman* 

The much publicized UNDP report that by 2050, India's population will reach 166.8 crore, surpassing China's population at 131.7 crore. It is alarming. India will emerge as the most populous country in the world in the next one year. India already accounts for around 17.5% of the world population. This is a situation which would not make India proud.
Let not anyone think that this is India’s problem. On the other hand, it would be a world problem, as high population density in India beyond acceptable level will lead to several issues globally in variety of ways. If a country has a highly dense population where the economic growth cannot sustain such dense population by generating employment or opportunities , the people in such region are bound to spill over to other countries , where there could be opportunities. This could create issues for other countries in course of time disturbing the demographic balance.
It is said that India’s population growth is declining. This is not a reason for comfort, as even with declining population growth, India’s population will reach unacceptable level. Such population growth would happen , even if child bearing were to fall immediately to around two births per woman. Even with a declining fertility rate, India’s population is expected to increase at alarming level.
There is a consensus view that economic development, adult literacy and women empowerment and education will lead to reduced children per family, There is also a view that when families realise that they are undergoing severe economic problems , they would themselves reduce the number of children. However, the ground reality is that India cannot afford to wait for such slow pace of change to take place to reduce the population level.
There is also a vague view about “demographic dividend", where it is said that more hands would mean greater work output and consequent faster economic development. This is a lopsided view, as in condition where skill level cannot be imparted adequately due to high population density, it would not be a case of demographic dividend but only a case of demographic drag.
While it is pointed out that longevity of life due to medical advancement may also be a contributing factor for population issue, this is a negative way of viewing things. The only positive way of checking the alarming population growth is to prevent births by appropriate strategies and educative campaign. Obviously, this is not being done adequately.
The ground reality is that after the national emergency, when coercive methods were adopted to control the population growth and people resented this and the then ruling party lost power, the subsequent governments seem to be viewing the population control as a delicate issue and population control strategies and implementation have virtually gone for a toss.
It is surprising that while Prime Minister Modi is talking about several issues and is striving to find solutions, he has not paid enough attention to curtail the population level in India drastically by discouraging births . While Mr. Modi has occasionally spoken about need for population control, he has not given the thrust that he normally gives for other issues such as public cleanliness, climate management and environmental issues etc.
Government of India and the state governments should not only be conscious about the ill effects of population growth in an already densely populated country , they should also make it appear before the people that the government is concerned about this grim situation. It should convince the people that urgent measures to control the population growth are not an option but inevitable, even as such measures s should not be coercive to the extent possible.
Government of India should insist that there should be only one child for family from now onwards. Some critics of one child for family policy cite the example in China, where strict enforcement of one child norm has resulted in disproportionate elderly population and causing shortage of working hands. This again, is a false view, as with the better health scenario , people work for longer period in life and automation has reduced the manpower requirement in several sectors.
Religious groups may object to one family norm. Government should reject their views strongly and move ahead with its population control measures. Allowing one or two religious groups not to observe the one child family norm and other religious groups observing this norm would lead to severe demographic imbalance in the country that would create social issues.
Government should also strictly enforce the rule that there could be only one wife for a man and polygamy should be strictly banned. While there are some rules already existing in this regard, it is seen that this is not strictly enforced. There are several politicians in India , who have more than one wife and remain as legislators, parliamentarians or ministers. Strict enforcement of one wife for one man could be a meaningful proactive strategy.
Several disincentives should be introduced to prevent multiple children in families and there are many such disincentive possibilities.
It is well known that two states namely Uttar Pradesh and Bihar are largely responsible for population growth in the country and these two states account for a quarter of India’s population ( over 36 crore) Certainly, a highly focused population control campaign is required in these two populous states.
It is also necessary that a separate ministry should be created with a cabinet rank minister in central government and all state governments to focus and implement government policies on population management with firm time schedule.
Finally, Indians should be conscious of the fact that even if India were to succeed in bringing down the population growth to near zero level in a decade, India would still remain as the most populous country and most densely populated country in the world for long time to come. This scenario clearly highlights the seriousness of the present population issue in India.
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Will official Modi invitation to Pope include itinerary of meeting Manipur Christians, too?

  By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  Few will not remember Judas Iscariot and the role he played in the betrayal of Jesus! For those who don’t know or don’t remember, these passages from Sacred Scripture will help put things in perspective: "And while they were eating, he said, 'Truly I tell you, one of you will betray me.' They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?' Jesus replied, 'The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl with me will betray from Sacred Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.' Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Rabbi?' Jesus answered, 'You have said so.'  (Mt. 26: 21-25)

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

Indira Gandhi, Balasaheb Deoras By Shamsul Islam* National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Manipur's Meira Paibis: Inter-sectional activism, regional bias, media misconstruction

By Biswanath Sinha*  The women led movement in India is a diverse and multifaceted phenomenon that reflects the country's vast cultural, social, and political landscape. One of the most distinctive and influential women's organizations in this tapestry is the Meira Paibi of Manipur. Known as the "torchbearers," Meira (lights/torch) Paibi (holder/bearer) carved out a unique space in the annals of women's activism in India.

Architects, planners, designers discuss impact of climate change on infrastructure

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The School of Architecture and Planning at the Woxsen University, Telengana, organized a conference on Architecture & Design of Built Environment (ADoBE) on 6-7th June 2024 at the Indian Institute of Technology, IIT-Hyderabad. The larger theme of the ADoBE’24 pivoted on ‘Cities Embracing Inclusivity’. 

Amidst climate of hate, none cares to remember VP Singh, not even his family

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*   It was former Prime Minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh's birthday on June 25. He would have turned 93 on this day. A man of great idealism and conviction, VP changed the politics of power in India that became more inclusive in terms of participation and representation of the marginalised in our highest decision making bodies. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.