Skip to main content

Women’s rights in the context of legal safeguards and affirmative action in India

By IMPRI Team 

The three-day immersive online legal awareness and certificate training programme on “Women’s Rights, Laws and Policies in India”, organised by IMPRI Gender Impact Studies Center (GISC), IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi took place on September 1, 2022 to September 3, 2022. The event was chaired by Prof Vibhuti Patel. Inaugurating the session Ms Tripta Behera, a researcher at IMPRI, welcomed the speakers and participants to the program with an introduction to the eminent panellists.
Commencing the program, the chair for the session, Prof Vibhuti Patel gave a brief about the legal safeguards and affirmative actions for women in the Indian state based on two routes, Judicial and Legislative route, through which India has asserted women’s rights. Further adding to it, she talked about India’s role in shaping the national and international policies for women’s rights and how the Indian parliament adopted the Women Empowerment policy in 2001 and committed to Millennium Development Goals and Sustainable Development Goals backed by women’s rights.

Day 1 | September 1, 2022

Day 1 of the programme included expert trainers including Prof Saumya Uma, Professor, Jindal Global Law School and Director, Centre for Women’s Rights (JGLS), Adv Sanchita Ain, Advocate-on-Record, Supreme Court of India, and Prof Vishal Narain, Professor, Management Development Institute (MDI), Gurgaon. Prof Uma based her talk on Indian Women’s Movements as a way of resistance to subordination, with the whole history divided into 4 distinct phases: the Social Reform Movement (1800s- early 1900s), the Nationalist Movement (early 1900s – 1947), post-Independence era (1947 – 1977) and Post Emergency/Contemporary period (1977 – present). She talked about how women’s participation in social movements has increased over time.
She pointed out the fact that the initial fight for women’s rights was initiated by men but with time women came to the forefront to fight for their own rights. All in all, she emphasised the indispensable role of the women’s movements in the formulation of laws, policies and institutional reforms to promote equality and inclusiveness. After this, Adv Sanchita Ain shared the presentation on ‘The Rights of Survivors of Sexual Violence under Criminal Law’. She explained, in detail the process, the procedures and the provisions that the women are entitled to but are generally unaware of. She emphasised the importance of counselling after situations of sexual assault/violence as the victim needs psychological, medical and legal support.
She went further to explain the rights and process while undergoing examination, filing the FIR, the investigation procedure and the compensation for the victim. This was an enlightening session that made women aware of their rights and gave them a new perspective on thinking the way they are conditioned by society. The comprehensive presentation by Prof Vishal Narain focused on gender relations in the context of Natural Resource Management with emphasis on water management in which he has done extensive research. He started off by explaining the difference between gender and sex and how gender is a social construct defined by the norms of State law, religion and social practices.
He further explained the different relationships that men and women have with natural resources based on these norms which need to be changed. He also brought light to the dimension of intersectionality between gender and caste and how it changes access to resources. He observed that gender norms are more fluid in the low-class groups than in the high-class groups. This subtle link between gender and natural resource management was very well brought up and explained by Prof Narain.

Day 2 | September 2, 2022

Day 2 of the program included eminent panellists Adv Dr Albertina Almeida, Lawyer and Human Rights Activist, Goa; Dr Amar Jesani, Independent Researcher and Teacher (Bioethics and Public Health), Editor, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, and Adv Dr Shalu Nigam, Advocate, Author, and Researcher, Gender and Human Rights. Starting with the session, Prof Vibhuti Patel gave a brief recap of the topics covered during the seminars on Day 1. She also provided an overview of the topics to be discussed on Day 2 of the workshop. Dr Albertina elaborated on how we should understand and use laws pertaining to sexual harassment in the workplace.
She started by explaining the historical context of the laws pertaining to sexual harassment in the workplace, through examples of cases such as the Bhanwari Devi case, Vishakha guidelines and the Nirbhaya case among others. She explained how each of these cases had different perspectives to offer on the issue. She further talked about the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 and highlighted key concepts as defined by the law. She explained the major aspects of this piece of legislation and concluded with a few of its limitations. Dr Amar kicked off his presentation on ‘Abortion: Law and Ethics’ by defining the key concepts of morality and ethics.
He delved into the historical trajectory of the issue and its relation to the medical profession as well as law. Further, he explained the differences between the conservative, liberal and moderate positions on abortion and elaborated on how abortion can be or not be viewed as a woman’s right. To conclude, he discussed a few challenges and dilemmas pertaining to the issue at hand. His lecture comprehensively covered the topic of abortion from ethical, legal as well as medical perspectives. Dr Shalu in her presentation talked about how the conservative patriarchal family ideology operates and is challenged in the courts.
She started her presentation with the concept of domestic violence, the concept itself and its various dimensions. She further talked about the law pertaining to domestic violence and the international framework around it. She moved on to how the issue is dealt with within the courts and gives rise to a ‘clash of ideologies’. She concluded by emphasizing the need for courts to adapt to the changing circumstances and aspirations of the new generation of women who are no longer seeking masters, but rather partners.

Day 3 | September 3, 2022

Day 3 of the program included eminent panellists Prof Bijayalaxmi Nanda, Principal, and Professor of Political Science, Miranda House, University of Delhi, Ms Urvashi Prasad, Director, Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office, NITI Aayog and Dr Nivedita Haran, Former Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Kerala. Kickstarting the session, Prof Patel gave an overview of the previous days and shared the themes for Day 3. Prof Bijayalaxmi in her lecture talked about the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, of 1994 and its role in countering gender discrimination. She started with some important trends regarding the sex ratio and what those trends mean. She highlighted the role played by womens’ movements in India in dealing with issues such as female foeticide and infanticide.
She also talked in detail about policy responses that can help deal with the issue of sex ratio imbalance. She concluded with how three are important in empowering women – Assets, Agency and Age Security. Ms Urvashi Prasad gave valuable insights regarding the gender policy framework in India and the challenges that need to be addressed. She gave a detailed description of the four broad areas of policy framework including Women’s Labour Force Participation Policies, Education Policies, Health and Nutrition Policies and Policies related to Women’s Safety Issues. She elaborated on the existing policies and stated that although governmental policy plays an enabling role in implementing these policies it cannot be effective in isolation and thus, needs participation from the private sector and society.
She stated that the lower participation rate of women in the labour market is the result of societal attitudes towards women. She also talked about the changing focus of policies in the education sector towards lowering the dropout rate of girl children from secondary and higher secondary education. She further stated the need not to view women’s health requirements as just limited to childbearing but also to give importance to non-communicable diseases and mental health problems in women. While concluding her talk, she emphasised the need for effective allocation and use of funds and the simultaneous participation by the private sector and society with the government for these policies to work in an efficient way.
Dr Nivedita Haran commenced with her presentation on the perspectives on legal challenges for women in bureaucracy by talking about the need for such legal rights as the number of women coming out of homes to enter the workplaces rises at a time when with technological advancement newer ways of sexual harassment cases are also on the rise with cyber-crimes gaining the centre stage. Her discussion was mainly based on the challenges faced by women employees from grade 3 or 4 levels in the government offices like personal assistants or secretaries who are not vociferous about the situations they face in the workplaces because of the prevalence of the political power hierarchies. She narrated two instances that she encountered while working in a government office as an IAS officer and while in the office of the United Nations.
She also talked about the formulation of the POSH Act 2013 as an aftermath of the Vishakha judgement. Closing the 3-Day informative session, the chair, Prof Vibhuti Patel gave her concluding remarks and thanked all the eminent panellists. She underlined many essential points that had been brought up by Nivedita Haran and stressed the need for women employees to come out with complete facts rather than ignoring workplace harassment just because of the power dynamics. She mentioned the important learnings and points that all nine sessions brought together and the need for the right perspective-building in the context of gender equality. In her powerful concluding remarks, she said, “ Knowledge empowers but the use of knowledge for gender equality brings social transformation.” The training program ended with a vote of thanks by Dr Suravie Ghimiray, IMPRI on behalf of IMPRI Gender Impact Studies Center (GISD).
---  
Acknowledgement: Vithita Jha and Fiza Mahajan, research interns at IMPRI

Comments

TRENDING

AMR: A gathering storm that threatens a century of progress in medicine

By Bobby Ramakant*  A strategic roundtable on “Charting a new path forward for global action against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)” was organised at the 77th World Health Assembly or WHA (WHA is the apex decision-making body of the World Health Organization – WHO, which is attended by all countries that are part of the WHO – a United Nations health agency). AMR is among the top-10 global health threats “Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a growing and urgent crisis which is already a leading cause of untimely deaths globally. More than 2 people die of AMR every single minute,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO. “AMR threatens to unwind centuries of progress in human health, animal health, and other sectors.”

Will official Modi invitation to Pope include itinerary of meeting Manipur Christians, too?

  By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  Few will not remember Judas Iscariot and the role he played in the betrayal of Jesus! For those who don’t know or don’t remember, these passages from Sacred Scripture will help put things in perspective: "And while they were eating, he said, 'Truly I tell you, one of you will betray me.' They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?' Jesus replied, 'The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl with me will betray from Sacred Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.' Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Rabbi?' Jesus answered, 'You have said so.'  (Mt. 26: 21-25)

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

Indira Gandhi, Balasaheb Deoras By Shamsul Islam* National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Top Punjab Maoist who failed to analyse caste question, promoted economism

By Harsh Thakor*  On June 15th we commemorated the 15th death anniversary of Harbhajan Singh Sohi or HBS, a well known Communist leader in Punjab. He expired of a heart attack in Bathinda in 2009.

Why Indian engineers are warning of prolonged blackouts amidst heatwave

By Shankar Sharma*  A news article  in "The Guardian" has raised a critical issue for the satisfactory operation of the national power grid in India. It says among other things: "Engineers in India have warned of the possibility of prolonged power outages in the north, where a heatwave has brought misery for millions of people. Demand for electricity has soared due to fans, air coolers and air conditioners being run constantly, placing a strain on the grid in Delhi and elsewhere in the north. Manufacturers of air conditioners and air coolers report sales rising by 40-50% compared with last summer. Power consumption in the northern state of Punjab has increased by 43% so far this month compared with the same period last year.