Skip to main content

Modi’s call for UCC an opportunity to fish in troubled waters for narrow partisan ends

By Prof. Sudhanshu Tripathi* 

The recent Uniform Civil Code (UCC) initiative by the Indian PM Narendra Modi has again engendered a clear polarization of almost the entire Muslim community in the country on grounds of interference into their personal laws governed by religious texts and its different interpretations. For them it (the UCC) also violates their long held and so practiced distinct way of life style and religious faith and the related common practices pertaining to marriage, divorce, succession, minority rights etc.
In fact, the proposed UCC has to rationalize some of the most important areas of personal laws with respect to the Muslim and other communities viz. Marriage & Divorce; Adoption & Maintenance Succession & Inheritance; and Minority Rights & Guardianship. Because these have already become very much archaic and even brute in certain respects due to not conforming with the fast changing aspirations and needs of the modern and liberal progressive age in our national, international and global life, interacting with the fast moving globalized world. Today the mobile and internet has become the utmost necessity and the buzz world as well for all, irrespective of caste, religion, region, community, language, region etc..
While the customary laws of the Hindu Community has been reformed continuously with changing requirements ever since the independence of the country, such laws in other communities obviously need to be reformed to make them join the national mainstream so that none may remain deprived of and excluded from the fruits of growth and development. If we look at the years immediately after the independence of India, the Land Ceiling Act, Zamidari Abolition Act and Abolition of the Privy Purse, Abolition of Sati Pratha and more were implemented in the interest of making the country an egalitarian and progressive society for all citizens. And that continues with apace with several such codifications in various areas of necessity like Hindu Succession Act with recent amendment providing for married girl/s to inherit their due share in paternal property at par with her brother/s, Hindu Marriage Act providing for Monogamy and such more.
All these steps were welcomed by the entire countrymen as these were the desirable duty of the state in India. And that is enshrined into Part IV of the Constitution under title Directive Principles of State Policy. Though not justiciable as Part III regarding Fundamental Rights, the aforesaid Part IV directs the state to perform its solemn duty to carry ahead the nation towards the desired trajectory of overall growth and progress while inculcating scientific temper and modern outlook among all citizens thereby leading to a homogeneous, equalitarian and egalitarian society.
That obviously demands bringing the other communities including Muslims, Jains, Buddhist, Sikhs, Christian, Parses and other fringe sections of society in accordance with the above-mentioned goals and objectives so that they can amalgamate with each other to forge a strong bonding thereby leading to a strong and consolidated national whole. However, it doesn’t mean that their personal preferences and likings based on religion, customs and conventions including language and dialect, dress, food and drink and community entertainments etc. will be sacrificed for the sake of national unity. In fact, that will add beauty to the consolidated whole as unity in diversity.
The unity in diversity is well-enshrined into our Constitution and that reflects the sagacity and visionary goals of our founding fathers in the Constituent Assembly who passionately championed the cause of national unity and social solidarity, that the evolving Indian nation has to consistently go through amidst stark dissimilarities and differences on aforesaid grounds among different communities constituting India as a nation.
That obviously brings into forefront the question of tradition and modernity with each struggling with the other ever since independence. But it has never damaged out national unity so far in any way howsoever and that will never happen in future: thanks to the wisdom of our founding fathers. Indeed, this looks as the glaring philosophy behind the proposed UCC that all other communities including Muslims must understand as that inevitably comes into the way of the nation building process. Indeed the modern and progressive-liberal societies of today like England, France, Germany, America and more have already passed through such traumatic experiences that India is undergoing through.
Thus all Indian citizens, particularly Muslims, must come forward to make the country strong and consolidated as a modern and progressive nation, instead of remaining entrapped into obscure and orthodox religious and communal moorings, being interpreted and dictated by the hardliner elements in their communities. These hardliners don’t want to let the community progress and prosper as a modern-rational-social grouping of progressive citizens just for their own vested interests due to claiming themselves to be the harbinger of the community for accomplishing overall prosperity and well-being.
Unfortunately the unholy nexus between these self-imposed harbingers and partisan political parties in the country has already wrecked-havoc by sowing the seeds of antagonism between two communities either in the form of appeasement or deliberately engendering infightings or communal riots during the past many decades, so as draw political mileage to win elections. This has unfortunately become a common fashion among political parties in India which are consistently reaping the dividends arising due to mutual differences between the two communities and others as well.
Against this backdrop, PM Modi’s clarion call for the UCC has again provided them a much desired opportunity to fish in troubled waters to realize their narrow and partisan political interests, while keeping an eye over the forthcoming Parliamentary Elections in 2024. This must be stopped forthwith by the collective efforts of We the People of India by overcoming their narrow or petty interests arising due to differences in caste, community, religion, region etc, as these are contrary to the reasons and rationale behind the UCC as well as the Constitution of India. This may happen as nothing is beyond human endeavour.
---
*Political Science, MDPG College, Pratapgarh (UP)

Comments

TRENDING

Will official Modi invitation to Pope include itinerary of meeting Manipur Christians, too?

  By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  Few will not remember Judas Iscariot and the role he played in the betrayal of Jesus! For those who don’t know or don’t remember, these passages from Sacred Scripture will help put things in perspective: "And while they were eating, he said, 'Truly I tell you, one of you will betray me.' They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?' Jesus replied, 'The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl with me will betray from Sacred Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.' Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Rabbi?' Jesus answered, 'You have said so.'  (Mt. 26: 21-25)

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

Indira Gandhi, Balasaheb Deoras By Shamsul Islam* National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Manipur's Meira Paibis: Inter-sectional activism, regional bias, media misconstruction

By Biswanath Sinha*  The women led movement in India is a diverse and multifaceted phenomenon that reflects the country's vast cultural, social, and political landscape. One of the most distinctive and influential women's organizations in this tapestry is the Meira Paibi of Manipur. Known as the "torchbearers," Meira (lights/torch) Paibi (holder/bearer) carved out a unique space in the annals of women's activism in India.

Architects, planners, designers discuss impact of climate change on infrastructure

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The School of Architecture and Planning at the Woxsen University, Telengana, organized a conference on Architecture & Design of Built Environment (ADoBE) on 6-7th June 2024 at the Indian Institute of Technology, IIT-Hyderabad. The larger theme of the ADoBE’24 pivoted on ‘Cities Embracing Inclusivity’. 

Amidst climate of hate, none cares to remember VP Singh, not even his family

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*   It was former Prime Minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh's birthday on June 25. He would have turned 93 on this day. A man of great idealism and conviction, VP changed the politics of power in India that became more inclusive in terms of participation and representation of the marginalised in our highest decision making bodies. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.