Skip to main content

Climate catastrophe: 67 NGOs call on banks to cease financing metallurgical coal

 
By Julia Hovenier, Helen Burley* 
A global group of 67 organisations led by BankTrack and Reclaim Finance is calling on 50 of the world’s largest banks to end all financial support for new metallurgical coal production and expansion. Metallurgical coal represents 14% of the world’s coal. Unlike thermal coal, it is predominately used for steelmaking and is refined into coke, a material combined with iron ore in a blast furnace to produce primary steel [1].
“The green steel transition is already underway, but financial institutions continue to invest in metallurgical coal—a dead end for the global steel industry and for the climate,” said Julia Hovenier, Banks and Steel Campaigner at BankTrack. "To prevent stranded assets and avoid deepening the climate emergency with their dollars, banks must swiftly adopt policies that halt the expansion of metallurgical coal."
According to a recent report by Reclaim Finance, while thermal coal investments face scrutiny for health and climate risks, metallurgical coal investments persist with less attention from banks. Despite 250 financial institutions adopting policies against thermal coal since the 2015 Paris Agreement, only 9 have similar policies for metallurgical coal.
Since 2016, the world’s biggest banks have provided US $557 billion in finance to the 50 biggest developers in the metallurgical coal sector. In 2021, the International Energy Agency said existing mines were sufficient to meet coking coal demand through 2050. Despite this, there are plans for new production capacities of 406 Mt per year, corresponding to more than a third of total consumption in 2021.
Due to its continued reliance on coal, the steel sector is responsible for an estimated 11% of global CO2 emissions and almost 30% of all industrial emissions. From mining to processing to transportation to combustion, metallurgical coal unleashes massive amounts of greenhouse gas emissions. If the banking industry continues to allow “business as usual” practices to continue, coal-based steelmaking is projected to consume nearly 25% of the world's remaining carbon budget by 2050.
The letters sent to 50 banks today call on them to end financial support for projects and companies that are investing in new metallurgical coal production and expansion. Of the 9 banks that have policies restricting finance for metallurgical coal, including BNP Paribas, Société Générale, HSBC, Westpac, and Caixa Bank, only three have corporate level exclusions [2]. This is despite the fact that only 1.4% of financing for met coal was direct project-financing since 2016.
“The world must urgently move away from coal-based steel production, and financial institutions bear a crucial responsibility in accommodating this transition,” emphasised Cynthia Rocamora, Industry Campaigner at Reclaim Finance. “It’s time to stop all types of finance for all types of new coal projects—thermal and metallurgical included.”
You can access the letter here.

Notes

[1] Primary steel is steel made from iron ore. It’s differentiated from secondary steel, which is made by recycling scrap steel.
[2] Reclaim Finance’s Coal Policy Tracker was updated in November 2023 to reflect the metallurgical coal policies of banks. They found that only nine banks have any policies regarding metallurgical coal: La Banque Postale, Societe Generale, BNP Paribas, CaxiaBank, Cathay United Bank, Lloyds Banking Group, Macquarie, HSBC, and Westpac. Of those nine, only the following three have corporate exclusions: Lloyds Banking Group, Societe Generale, and Macquarie. However, Reclaim Finance has analysed them all as “weak” exclusions because they do not directly target developers of new metallurgical coal projects.
---
Julia Hovenier is Banks and Steel Campaigner, BankTrack; Helen Burley is with International Media, Reclaim Finance

Comments

TRENDING

Will official Modi invitation to Pope include itinerary of meeting Manipur Christians, too?

  By Fr Cedric Prakash SJ*  Few will not remember Judas Iscariot and the role he played in the betrayal of Jesus! For those who don’t know or don’t remember, these passages from Sacred Scripture will help put things in perspective: "And while they were eating, he said, 'Truly I tell you, one of you will betray me.' They were very sad and began to say to him one after the other, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Lord?' Jesus replied, 'The one who has dipped his hand into the bowl with me will betray from Sacred Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.' Then Judas, the one who would betray him, said, 'Surely you don’t mean me, Rabbi?' Jesus answered, 'You have said so.'  (Mt. 26: 21-25)

RSS supremo Deoras 'supported' Emergency, but Indira, Sanjay Gandhi 'didn't respond'

Indira Gandhi, Balasaheb Deoras By Shamsul Islam* National Emergency was imposed on the country by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ''dark times' for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan's call to the armed forces to disobey the 'illegal' orders of Congress rulers had created a situation of anarchy and there was danger to the existence of Indian Republic so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Amidst climate of hate, none cares to remember VP Singh, not even his family

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*   It was former Prime Minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh's birthday on June 25. He would have turned 93 on this day. A man of great idealism and conviction, VP changed the politics of power in India that became more inclusive in terms of participation and representation of the marginalised in our highest decision making bodies. 

Manipur's Meira Paibis: Inter-sectional activism, regional bias, media misconstruction

By Biswanath Sinha*  The women led movement in India is a diverse and multifaceted phenomenon that reflects the country's vast cultural, social, and political landscape. One of the most distinctive and influential women's organizations in this tapestry is the Meira Paibi of Manipur. Known as the "torchbearers," Meira (lights/torch) Paibi (holder/bearer) carved out a unique space in the annals of women's activism in India.

Architects, planners, designers discuss impact of climate change on infrastructure

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  The School of Architecture and Planning at the Woxsen University, Telengana, organized a conference on Architecture & Design of Built Environment (ADoBE) on 6-7th June 2024 at the Indian Institute of Technology, IIT-Hyderabad. The larger theme of the ADoBE’24 pivoted on ‘Cities Embracing Inclusivity’. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.