Skip to main content

Why today notion of free market, touted as free and fair, is far from reality

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

Historically, markets were established by working people to serve their everyday needs and desires. These markets were grounded in the local communities they served, reflecting the economic and social realities of the time. People would come together in these markets to trade goods and services, fostering a sense of community and mutual dependence.
The primary focus was on meeting the essential needs of the population, ensuring access to food, clothing, tools, and other necessities. In these early markets, transactions were straightforward, often based on barter or simple currency systems, and were characterised by direct interactions between producers and consumers.
This setup allowed for greater transparency and trust, as buyers could directly engage with sellers, understand the origins and quality of the products, and negotiate fair prices. The primary aim was to facilitate the exchange of goods and services in a manner that benefited all parties involved, enhancing the well-being of the entire community.
The markets have historically played a crucial role in transforming economic activities of producers into social activities, thereby establishing and nurturing relationships between producers and consumers. In its earliest forms, the market was more than just a venue for buying and selling goods; it was a vibrant social and cultural institution where people interacted, exchanged ideas, and built community ties.
By facilitating direct interactions between producers and consumers, markets enabled a deeper understanding and appreciation of the goods being traded. Consumers could meet the people who grew their food, made their clothes, or crafted their tools, creating a sense of trust and mutual respect. This direct relationship fostered a sense of accountability among producers, who took pride in the quality of their work, knowing they were serving their neighbours and community members.
The market, both as an institution and as a process, was originally intended to facilitate life, making it easier for people to obtain the goods and services they needed. It was designed to serve the community, providing a space where people could exchange resources efficiently and equitably. The core idea was to enhance the quality of life for everyone involved by ensuring the availability and accessibility of essential products and services and fostering economic and social interdependence.
Market was an institution of solidarity and a process of cooperation for a meaningful life and mutual existence. As societies grew more complex and inter(dependent) economies expanded, the nature of markets evolved. However, the foundational principles of market were changed in the name of promoting free market.
However, the so-called free market in its current form has deviated significantly from this original purpose. Today, it often controls everyday lives, functioning primarily as a tool for profit-making for a select few capitalists. Instead of serving the broader community, the modern market prioritises the interests of large corporations and wealthy individuals.
These entities have the power to influence market dynamics to their advantage, often at the expense of the average consumer and small producer. This shift has led to a situation where the market dictates the terms of economic, social and cultural life, influencing everything from job availability and wages to the prices of essential goods and services. The focus on maximising profit has resulted in practices that undermine the well-being of the broader population, such as monopolistic behaviours, exploitation of labour, and environmental degradation.
In essence, the market has transformed from a community-oriented institution into a profit-driven mechanism that primarily benefits a small elite, often leaving the majority of people with little control over their economic, social, political and cultural purposes of their everyday lives. This distortion of the market's original purpose highlights the need for a re-evaluation of how economic systems are structured and governed to ensure they truly serve the needs and desires of all people, not just a privileged few.
The concept of a free market in all its forms within a capitalist system is often touted as being both free and fair. However, this notion is far from reality. The free market is intended to provide freedom to both consumers and producers, yet in practice, neither group truly experiences this freedom. In a so-called free market, consumers and producers are not provided with sufficient information about the products, their producers, or the costs involved in production.
This lack of transparency leaves consumers in the dark about the reasoning behind pricing decisions. Instead of being a truly open and fair system, the free market operates as a controlled mechanism of global capitalism.
Market as institution was originally intended to facilitate life, making it easier for people to obtain the goods and services they needed
Large corporations dominate this landscape, enhancing their profits by creating a disconnect between consumers and producers. They manipulate the market to establish independent pricing mechanisms that prioritize their interests, often leading to super-profits at the expense of fairness and transparency. Moreover, these corporations often engage in practices that stifle competition, such as forming monopolies or oligopolies, which further undermines the principles of a truly free market.
As a result, consumers face higher prices and limited choices, while smaller producers struggle to survive in an environment skewed heavily in favour of big business. In essence, the so-called free market is less about freedom and fairness and more about the strategic manipulation of economic systems to benefit a select few, exacerbating inequality and reducing the agency of both consumers and producers.
Over time, as markets grew and became more complex, these direct relationships were often replaced by more impersonal transactions. However, the fundamental role of the market in linking economic and social activities remains evident.
Modern movements such as farmers' markets, local artisanal fairs, and community-supported agriculture (CSA) programs are efforts to rekindle these direct connections, emphasizing the social dimensions of economic exchange. Technology and digital market platforms can facilitate these objectives if these digital infrastructures are controlled by the communities.
The market has historically been instrumental in converting economic activities into social ones, establishing meaningful relationships between producers and consumers. This legacy underscores the potential of markets to not only drive economic prosperity but also to build strong, connected communities. It is time to reclaim free and fair market which serves as community hubs, where people gathered not just to trade, but to socialise, share news, and engage in cultural activities.
These interactions helped to weave the economic fabric into the social fabric of the community, making economic activities a vital part of daily life and social cohesion. It is time to struggle and reclaim free market from free marketers of capitalism and defeat its market-driven culture of mass consumerism and alienation.
---
*London Metropolitan University

Comments

TRENDING

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

India’s climate tech ecosystem in dire need of both early, growth-stage funding: Report

By Our Representative India’s climate tech ecosystem, which boasts over 800 startups, is in dire need of both early and growth-stage funding to leverage its full potential, according to a report by Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (Ventures) and MUFG Bank , Japan. Despite a robust initial funding landscape, with approximately two-thirds of climate tech startups receiving seed capital, growth-stage investments remain critically lacking. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

UNEP report on how climate crisis is impacting displacement, global conflicts, declining health

By Shankar Sharma*  A recent report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), titled "A Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health and Human Wellbeing," warrants urgent attention from our country’s developmental perspective. The findings, detailed in the report, should be a source of significant concern not only globally but especially for our nation, which has a vast population and limited natural resources. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

75 years of revolution: How China moved away from ideals of struggle for human liberation

By Harsh Thakor*  On October 1st, we celebrate the 75th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution, a pivotal moment in the struggle for human liberation. From 1949 to 1976, China achieved remarkable social equality and revolutionary democracy, outpacing other developing nations in literacy, health care, agricultural output, and industrial production. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.