Skip to main content

Will opposition attacks continuing against Modi lose steam in long run?

By NS Venkataraman* 

During the last several months before the recent parliamentary elections,  during the parliamentary election campaign and in the subsequent weeks after the declaration of the results, opposition parties in India, who named themselves as INDI Alliance, have carried out well planned, relentless attacks to allegedly defame Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
The opposition parties thought that the only way they could defeat the Bharatiya Janata Party was to weaken Modi by constantly criticising him in person. Several terms used freely against Modi included ”thief”, “merchant of death”,  “dictator”, “arrogant” and so on.  Modi, by and large, appeared to have ignored such kind of campaign to the extent possible, though at times, he would get annoyed.
With the number of parliamentary seats won by BJP during the recent elections is less than the seats won during the earlier elections, the opposition parties, particularly the Congress, seem convinced that their  campaign against Modi has paid them much dividend. They seem to have decided that such  campaign to further weaken Modi’s image and popularity must continue.
Several political researchers have been examining various factors to conclude as to what caused the comparatively poor performance of Modi’s party in the recent elections. Most of them seem to have concluded that the opposition campaign against Modi carried out in public meetings and in social media such as X platform, Instagram, Tik Tok, Facebook and YouTube have considerably helped the opposition to make sections of voters to turn against Modi.
Further, several political researchers seem to be of the view that accusations made against Modi such as Modi would destroy the Constitution, Modi would withdraw job reservation in government and reservation in educational institutions for those people described as “scheduled caste, scheduled tribe”, and so on, also undermined BJP performance.
In addition, some opposition parties, including the Congress, made promises such as Nyay Promise to provide Rs 1 lakh per year to poor women. There was reason to wonder if such cash promise was implementable as it would mean huge financial implications for the government. The Congress and its allies even went to the extent of providing guarantee letters in writing in thousands to the poor women.
Now that Modi has assumed power again as Prime Minister and with the commencement of parliamentary sessions, it appears that the opposition parties appear to be set to convey an impression to the public that the  government is having confrontational attitude and does not want to yield to the demands of the opposition parties at any cost. 
Congress leaders, including Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, have attacked Modi personally by stating that Modi is undermining democracy and dignity, while accusing him  of coercing opposition leaders, going to the extent of arresting opposition chief ministers.
The opposition parties are likely to use every opportunity to criticize Modi in person in the coming days and disrupt the parliamentary proceedings under one pretext or the other.
In India, media are largely owned by business houses with profit motive or political parties with vested interests. Media, whether print media or visual, have already begun giving  publicity to what many think are mindless strong words  used by the opposition against Modi, as they seem to be of the view that this would increase their readership/ viewership and help them to achieve their objective. 
Now, where would Indian politics go from here? Modi protagonists assert that the track record of  Modi during the last ten years has been very impressive by all accounts. India’s stature in the world forums have gone up significantly. Foreign exchange reserves have reached record level. Several infrastructure projects are being carried out with high speed. Several schemes have been introduced to promote industrial growth, economic development and social upliftment. 
However, the view has gone strong  lately such positives are not being highlighted in the media adequately.
The moot question is, whether the opposition's campaign against Modi would provide only short term gains and would become counter productive in the long run. If such negative campaign continues endlessly, wouldn't people feel frustrated and become tired? And would Modi  stand his ground in such conditions and continue to move on to achieve the goal of building of his perception of strong India, with the opposition campaign losing steam sooner rather than later? 
---
*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

TRENDING

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

India’s climate tech ecosystem in dire need of both early, growth-stage funding: Report

By Our Representative India’s climate tech ecosystem, which boasts over 800 startups, is in dire need of both early and growth-stage funding to leverage its full potential, according to a report by Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (Ventures) and MUFG Bank , Japan. Despite a robust initial funding landscape, with approximately two-thirds of climate tech startups receiving seed capital, growth-stage investments remain critically lacking. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

UNEP report on how climate crisis is impacting displacement, global conflicts, declining health

By Shankar Sharma*  A recent report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), titled "A Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health and Human Wellbeing," warrants urgent attention from our country’s developmental perspective. The findings, detailed in the report, should be a source of significant concern not only globally but especially for our nation, which has a vast population and limited natural resources. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

75 years of revolution: How China moved away from ideals of struggle for human liberation

By Harsh Thakor*  On October 1st, we celebrate the 75th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution, a pivotal moment in the struggle for human liberation. From 1949 to 1976, China achieved remarkable social equality and revolutionary democracy, outpacing other developing nations in literacy, health care, agricultural output, and industrial production. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.