Skip to main content

Equal representation? Elite dominance 'undermining' essence of democracy

Bhabani Shankar Nayak* 

The reality of Western democracy is structured in such a way that it effectively excludes many people from meaningful participation in decision-making processes. While citizens do vote and participate in elections, this engagement often serves as a veneer of inclusivity and equal opportunity that masks the underlying dominance of elites within the political system.
Despite the semblance of democratic participation, the political structure is heavily influenced and controlled by a small group of elites who have the power to shape policies and allocate resources in ways that primarily serve their own interests.
This elite dominance undermines the core democratic principle of equal representation and results in a political landscape where the voices of ordinary citizens are marginalised by the so-called democratic governments and states in Europe and America.
The concentration of power among elites leads to a political process that is less responsive to the needs and desires of the broader population. Instead, it tends to prioritise the agendas of those with significant economic and social influence.
This dynamic perpetuates inequality and fosters a sense of disenfranchisement among the general populace, who may feel that their votes and voices do not translate into actual influence over the governance of their countries.
The principles of democratic governance -- transparency, accountability, the rule of law, and inclusiveness -- are increasingly eroding within Western political systems. Despite the theoretical framework supporting broader political participation and fairer representation, the fundamental nature of capitalist states in Europe and America remains unchanged.
This persistent decline highlights a critical issue: the mechanisms designed to ensure a vibrant democracy are failing to counterbalance the entrenched power structures within these societies.
Even as citizens engage in elections and other forms of political participation, their ability to influence substantive policy decisions is severely limited. This discrepancy underscores a troubling trend where democratic ideals are subverted by economic interests of few capitalists.
In Western democracies, the alignment of government policies with the interests of capitalist corporations rather than those of the general populace is evident. This alignment manifests in legislation and regulatory frameworks that often prioritise corporate profitability and market stability over social welfare and equitable resource distribution.
The interests of ordinary citizens are sidelined, and their needs and aspirations are inadequately represented. The foundational principles of democracy are destroyed as a result of which citizens are no longer the shareholders of western democracy.
The so-called Western democratic countries, which often engage in imperialist wars, promote conflicts, and impose sanctions under the pretext of exporting democracy to countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, are experiencing a significant decline in their own democratic values and practices.
This situation highlights a profound irony and exposes the inherent contradictions within their political systems. The tragedy of these undemocratic foundations lies in their persistent assault on the very democratic values they claim to uphold.
While advocating for democracy abroad, these nations frequently undermine democratic principles at home. This duality not only erodes the credibility of Western democracies but also reveals the farcical nature of their commitment to genuine democratic ideals.
As these countries continue to prioritize geopolitical interests over the promotion of authentic democracy, the gap between their rhetoric and reality widens. This ongoing hypocrisy challenges the legitimacy of their democratic institutions and calls into question their role as global champions of democracy.
Consequently, it is imperative to critically examine and address these contradictions to foster a more genuine and consistent approach to democratic governance both domestically and internationally.
The so-called Western governments seemingly have the financial resources to engage in wars, military interventions and conflicts in various countries across Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.
However, these same governments often fall short when it comes to investing in the critical infrastructures of health, education, and employment within their own nations. This disparity reveals a troubling prioritisation of resources.
Significant amounts of money are allocated to defence budgets and military operations, ostensibly to promote interests of global corporations in the name of global stability or protect national interests.
Yet, when it comes to addressing pressing domestic issues, such as expanding healthcare services, improving educational systems, and creating meaningful employment opportunities, these governments often claim budgetary constraints.
The consequences of this democratic deficit and misallocation of resources are profound. Underfunded health systems struggle to provide adequate care, leading to disparities in health outcomes and accessibility.
Educational institutions face resource shortages, impacting the quality of education and future prospects for students. Meanwhile, the lack of investment in creating sustainable and meaningful employment opportunities contributes to economic inequality and social instability.
The growth of hunger, homelessness, food insecurity, unemployment, and poverty represent a democratic disgrace for the so-called developed capitalist countries, where democracy is sacrificed to uphold the interests of corporate capitalism.
In these nations, the gap between the wealthy elite and the average citizen continues to widen, highlighting the failure of democratic systems to address the fundamental needs of their populations.
Despite the immense wealth and resources available in these countries, a significant portion of the population struggles with basic necessities. This stark contrast reveals the extent to which democratic ideals have been compromised in favour of maintaining and expanding corporate power and profits.
The prevalence of hunger and food insecurity is particularly alarming in affluent societies. Many individuals and families face difficulty accessing nutritious food, leading to widespread health problems and diminished quality of life.
Similarly, homelessness and inadequate housing conditions reflect the inability of the system to provide for its citizens, despite the presence of vast economic resources.
In Western democracies, alignment of government policies with the interests of capitalists  rather than those of the general populace is evident
Unemployment and underemployment further exacerbate these issues of individual dignity, as individuals are unable to secure stable, well-paying jobs that allow them to support themselves and their families. The resulting poverty traps many in a cycle of deprivation, with limited opportunities for upward mobility.
These social and economic issues in western countries are symptoms of a broader political problem: the prioritisation of corporate capitalism over the well-being of the populace.
Policies and practices that favour large corporations and the wealthy elite often come at the expense of the broader citizenry, undermining the principles of fairness, equity, and representation that are supposed to underpin democratic governance.
Such a situation not only calls for a re-evaluation of national priorities but also highlights the urgent need for mass struggle to deepen radical democracy and reclaim citizenship rights in western Europe and America.
This mass mobilisation can serve as a powerful force to challenge and change the existing power dynamics. By advocating for more equitable distribution of resources and greater public participation in decision-making processes, citizens can work towards a political system that truly represents their interests.
The push for radical democracy involves creating mechanisms for more direct citizen involvement, ensuring that policies and practices reflect the will of the majority rather than the interests of a privileged few. It requires transparency, accountability, and a commitment to social justice. Only through sustained collective action can citizens reclaim their rights and create a more just and equitable society.
These challenges also require a fundamental re-evaluation of the relationship between democracy and capitalism. It is essential to implement policies that ensure economic justice, such as fair wages, affordable housing, accessible healthcare, and robust social safety nets. It is vital to curb corporate influence in politics and promote greater transparency and accountability within the government.
The restoring of the integrity of democracy in these developed capitalist countries involves reclaiming it from the clutches of corporate interests and redirecting its focus towards serving the needs and rights of all citizens. By doing so, it is possible to build a society that is more just, equitable, and reflective of true democratic values.
---
*London Metropolitan University

Comments

TRENDING

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

India’s climate tech ecosystem in dire need of both early, growth-stage funding: Report

By Our Representative India’s climate tech ecosystem, which boasts over 800 startups, is in dire need of both early and growth-stage funding to leverage its full potential, according to a report by Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (Ventures) and MUFG Bank , Japan. Despite a robust initial funding landscape, with approximately two-thirds of climate tech startups receiving seed capital, growth-stage investments remain critically lacking. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

UNEP report on how climate crisis is impacting displacement, global conflicts, declining health

By Shankar Sharma*  A recent report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), titled "A Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health and Human Wellbeing," warrants urgent attention from our country’s developmental perspective. The findings, detailed in the report, should be a source of significant concern not only globally but especially for our nation, which has a vast population and limited natural resources. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway.