Born two decades ago, how the banned Maoist party failed to withstand evolving socio-political realities
By Harsh Thakor*
On September 21, exactly two decades ago, the now banned Communist Party of India (Maoist) (CPI-Maoist) was established. It was born following the merger brought of two factions—the Maoist Communist Centre of India, primarily based in Bihar and West Bengal, and the CPI (ML) People’s War—after more than 30 years of intense armed struggle and internal conflicts.
Since its formation on September 21, 2004, sources in the the CPI (Maoist) claim, as many as 5,249 comrades, including 22 members of its Central Committee, among whom a significant number are women, were killed mainly during encounter with Indian security forces.
The journey of the CPI (Maoist) is rooted in the famous 1967 Naxalbari uprising led by Charu Mazumdar, which was praised by the Communist Party of China (CPC) as the "Spring Thunder over India." The uprising followed a revolt within the CPI (M) by those who adhered to the Maoist ideology, emphasizing an armed agrarian revolution and area-wide political power seizure.
The party's military strategy included protracted people’s war (PPW), which has now turned into currently turned into what it calls ‘strategic defense.’ It claims to have wage liberation movement against the Indian state by opposing the privatization of resources, labor exploitation, and the spread of the Hindutva ideology. In regions of Central India, it supplanted ‘people’s governments’ in several regions, claiming, these have been formed by Adivasi peasants, demonstrating a genuine implementation of self-governance.
Many Maoist leaders, active since the 1970s and 1980s, are currently enduring the harsh realities of underground life with minimal resources or recognition, even as facing severe state repression over multiple decades starting with the crackdown on Naxalbari uprising.
After the CPI (Maoist) was formed in 2004, the government identified it as a principal internal security threat, escalating counterinsurgency operations, which include the most recent ones like the Operation Kagaar and the Operation Green Hunt.
The Indian government first launches a nationwide counterinsurgency operation in 2009. Under BJP rule since 2014, it intensified operations, which critics say, is meant to implement corporatization and militarization of the conflict zones, where there have been frequent drone strikes and aerial bombings in the tribal regions.
Several intellectuals and activists have praised the CPI (Maoist) for its contributions to social and economic development in rural areas. Authors such as Arundhati Roy and Gautam Navlakha have highlight the Maoists' role in fostering self-governance and improving the quality of life for the rural poor. However, critics note the challenges faced by Maoists, including dwindling ranks and internal divisions.
Despite its big claims, the CPI (Maoist) has faced considerable setbacks, with a number of its members killed or surrendering due to heightened state pressure and the allure of government incentives. This situation has raised questions about the party's connection to the people and its strategic approaches.
The CPI (Maoist) acknowledges significant losses over the past year, particularly in Chhattisgarh, revealing vulnerabilities in its structure. In documenting these losses, the party has recognized the efficacy of state forces and their counterinsurgency tactics.
Questions have been raised on the ability of the CPI (Maoist) in the present situation to gain traction among the broader marginalized population and effectively address the root causes of discontent. It has failed to navigate internal and external challenges that threaten to undermine its stated objectives.
In a 25-page booklet, released on August 25, CPI (Maoist) has admitted that the heightened aggression of security forces and ‘cordon, search and kill tactics’ have significantly weakened its organization.
According to the report, 22 high-ranking commanders have been killed, including eight members of the CPI (Maoist) politburo. The toll includes 48 SZC (special zonal committee) members, 14 regional committee members, 167 district committee members, 26 sub-zonal committee members, 505 ACMs (area committee members) and platoon cadres, 887 People’s Liberation Guerrilla Army (PLGA) cadres and what it calls 3,596 ‘fighters’.
The booklet details the impact of the insurgency on state forces, including Chhattisgarh. Maoists claim to have killed 3,090 security personnel and injuring 4,077. The banned outfit says its cadres carried out 4,073 incidents of violence “between Burkapal and Tahkawada in Bastar”, and “extending into Maharashtra, Odisha, and Jharkhand”.
Indeed, the methods and ideology of the CPI (Maoist) have failed to sustain the party amidst intensified state repression and evolving socio-political realities. The result is (i) the CPI (Maoist) leadership’s alienation from the people; (ii) popular resentment against its activities; and (iii) its fast-extinguishing base in the forests of Chhattisgarh, Telangana and the border areas of Gadchiroli in Maharashtra.
---
*Freelance journalist
Comments