Skip to main content

NAPM expresses solidarity with Ladakh’s demand for Sixth Schedule, Constitutional rights

By Our Representative 

The National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) has announced its unequivocal support for the Ladakhi people's ongoing struggle for constitutional rights and environmental protection. In a statement released on Saturday, NAPM condemned the central government for failing to deliver on its promises and demanded urgent dialogue with Ladakhi leaders to address their concerns, including granting Ladakh Sixth Schedule Status under the Indian Constitution.
NAPM’s support comes as Sonam Wangchuk, a prominent environmentalist, along with 20 other Ladakhi activists, have been on an indefinite fast at Ladakh Bhawan in Delhi. Their fast is a response to the Union Government’s "failure" to engage in meaningful dialogue despite prior assurances. On October 2nd, 2023, during the release of 160 Ladakhi Padyatris (marchers), government leaders had promised to address the demands raised by Ladakhi activists. However, these promises remain unfulfilled, pushing the activists to protest once again.
Ladakh, which was separated from Jammu & Kashmir and designated a Union Territory in 2019, has been grappling with concerns about the exploitation of its natural resources, particularly due to large-scale infrastructure projects. One major point of contention is the 13-gigawatt renewable energy project under the Green Energy Corridor (GEC) Phase-II. While the project aims to harness clean energy, it has caused alarm among locals due to its potential impact on Ladakh’s environment, land, and traditional livelihoods such as cattle grazing and tourism.
To safeguard Ladakh’s ecosystem and cultural heritage, activists are demanding that Ladakh be granted Sixth Schedule Status—a provision that grants autonomy to tribal areas in several northeastern states like Assam and Mizoram. The Sixth Schedule would give Ladakh greater control over land, resources, and governance, preventing what NAPM calls "destructive development" and protecting the region from displacement and environmental degradation.
NAPM sharply criticized the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government, accusing it of making false promises during its 2019 election campaign and failing to act on assurances given to Ladakhi leaders. The organization also denounced the government’s handling of peaceful protests, referring to the detention of activists during the Climate March earlier this year. The march, which called attention to Ladakh's environmental challenges, was met with police action on Gandhi Jayanti, a day symbolizing peace and non-violence.
“The government's response to peaceful struggles is unconstitutional and unjustifiable,” NAPM stated, adding that the detention of marchers on a day meant to honor Mahatma Gandhi’s values of non-violence was particularly troubling.
NAPM called upon all Indian citizens who support decentralized development planning and the creation of local employment opportunities to stand with the people of Ladakh. They argue that development should not come at the cost of the environment or the displacement of indigenous communities. According to NAPM, the Sixth Schedule would ensure that Ladakh can pursue development without compromising its fragile ecosystem or the livelihood of its people.
“We stand in full solidarity with the Leh Apex Body, the Kargil Democratic Association, and the people of Ladakh in their fight to protect democracy, the constitution, and the Himalayas,” NAPM declared in its statement, urging the authorities to engage in meaningful dialogue.
As the fast at Ladakh Bhawan continues, NAPM and Ladakhi activists are hopeful that the Union Government will respond to their demands, ensuring that Ladakh's rights and resources are protected in line with the principles of justice, sustainability, and democratic governance.
Signatories to NAPM’s statement include prominent activists such as Arundhati Dhuru, Medha Patkar, Suniti S R, Prafulla Samantara, and others, reflecting the collective support of NAPM’s member organizations across India.

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists?

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to what it calls questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Fostered by those in power, hatred 'hasn't been' part of Indian narrative

By Osman Sher*  It is strikingly ironic that the current climate of prevalent hate in India is fostered not by a disruptive fringe of society, but by those in power—individuals entrusted by the citizens to promote their welfare and foster peace and harmony. It is their responsibility to guide and nurture the populace as if they were their flock. 

Muslims 'reject' religious polarisation of Jamaat-e-Islami: Marxist victory in Kulgam, Kashmir

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  In the international sphere, an orgy of imperialist violence and wars on multiple fronts is unleashed on the world's population to divide people on religious and nationalist lines, destabilise peace, deepen crises, and control resources in the name of nationalism and religion. Under the guise of fighting Islamic terrorism and exporting the so-called market-led Western democracy, imperialist powers are ghettoising Muslims to control natural resources in various parts of Asia, as well as in Arab and Middle Eastern countries. 

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

NGO coalition criticises Odisha govt for 'abrupt closure' of PVTG nutrition programme

By Our Representative  A coalition of non-governmental organizations has condemned the Odisha government's decision to abruptly end a vital nutrition program for children of Primitive Tribal Groups (PVTG) communities. The program, which provided community-based creches and feeding centers, has been a lifeline for thousands of young children in the state.

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.