Skip to main content

Sexual violence stems from 'entrenched views' on role of women in India

By Madhumita Pandey* 

Twelve years ago, in 2012, people around the world read with horror as details emerged of how a 22-year-old woman named Jyoti Singh was raped on a bus in New Delhi by six men. She died from her injuries in hospital less than two weeks later.
The incident, which is commonly known as the Nirbhaya case, became a watershed moment for India and focused the national conversation on violence against women. Massive protests broke out in the capital and quickly spread across state borders as people demanded justice.
Laws were subsequently amended to recognise wider definitions of violence against women, sanctions were put in place for police inaction, and stricter punishments were introduced for perpetrators – including the death penalty.
Not every case makes it to the front pages of the newspapers. According to data from India’s National Crime Records Bureau, nearly 90 rapes were reported on average every day in 2022. And the actual number is likely to be even higher.
But the recent rape and murder of a 31-year-old female trainee doctor in India has garnered international attention. Her body was found in the seminar hall of a reputable teaching hospital in Kolkata where she worked.
Within hours of the news breaking, people rallied on the streets across the state of West Bengal in solidarity with the victim. And doctors throughout India observed a nationwide strike, with hospitals and clinics turning away non-emergency patients.
In an interview with the Guardian, the young doctor’s father said: “We are a poor family and we raised her with a lot of hardship. She worked extremely hard to become a doctor. All she did was study, study, study”.
This sentiment is precisely what brings people to the streets each time a case like this emerges. We have seen the death not only of another woman, but the death of an aspirational, modern Indian woman who represents the future of the country.

Looking back to understand the future

Around the same time as Jyoti Singh’s murder, I conducted one of the first studies to take into account the perspectives of convicted rapists in India. The motive was simple: to understand the underlying social mechanisms that support and maintain violence against women in India.
This involved exploring the attitudes towards women and perceptions of culpability in convicted rapists and non-sex offenders in Delhi’s Tihar Jail. After hours of listening to their stories, I realised that these men expressed attitudes that very much reflect the psyche of Indian society.
The men convicted of rape expressed attitudes including victim blaming, a sense of entitlement and a lack of understanding of consent. These are factors that research has shown contribute to aggressive behaviour and sexual violence against women around the world.
Rapists are not alone in expressing such attitudes. A clip posted on YouTube by Indian online newspaper The Print in 2019, six years after the Nirbhaya case, captured mens’ attitudes towards women on the streets of Delhi. A recurring viewpoint was that rapes will inevitably happen if women wear revealing clothes.
Since the Nirbhaya case, there have been several other prominent rape and murder cases in India. And on each occasion we have seen this trend of mass protesting for a couple of weeks before everything dies down.
Research suggests that states often turn to symbolic action to appease public outrage, such as delivering harsher punishments like the death penalty. But studies show that punishments like the death penalty do not deter sexual violence. If anything, they can encourage the perpetrators to kill the victim so that there is less chance of being identified.
This was seen in 2019, when a 26-year-old veterinarian was brutally gang-raped and killed by four men before they burned her body in Shamshabad, a town in the Indian state of Telangana.
It is rape, and not sex, that is the problem. But India has long taken a regressive approach to sex education, which is recognised as crucial to progress in education, poverty reduction and gender equality.
A report also revealed that 89% of people in India watched porn via mobile devices in 2019, a 3% increase from 2017. And, according to author Aditya Gautam’s 2018 book "Pornistan: How to survive the porn epidemic in India", the country contributes to between 5% and 10% of the worldwide Google searches for adult products.
With easy access to the internet and smartphone devices, it is all the more crucial to educate and create awareness around consent and what healthy intimate relationships look like.
My research with convicted violent offenders in India highlights that, because rape qualifies as an extreme form of sexual violence, it is often overlooked that the motivation and support for such acts stems from the entrenched views of the roles of women in society.
But the everyday threat of sexual violence towards women continues to exist in Indian society, and that is what needs more attention.
---
*Senior Lecturer in Criminology, Sheffield Hallam University. Source: The Conversation

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege NestlĂ©’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on NestlĂ© to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.